Screen every applicant, and never ghost a candidate again.
Six hundred applicants per role, a recruiter who can read forty, and candidates left waiting two weeks for a reply.
80%+
of screening effort automated
days to hours
time-to-first-contact
100%
of candidates get a response
8
documented automations for this sector
Where recruiting teams lose hours, and what replaces it.
Each one is a system we have specified and built before.
Structured CV screening
- The manual process today
- Screening is done on gut feel in whatever order CVs arrive.
- What we build
- Every application scored against the same explicit criteria, with evidence quoted from the CV and a shortlist ranked for a recruiter to confirm.
- Typical impact
- Whole applicant pool assessed instead of the first forty.
Candidate screening interviews
- The manual process today
- Phone screens eat recruiter days and get scheduled a week out.
- What we build
- An async chat or voice screen candidates complete on their own time, producing a structured summary and recommendation.
- Typical impact
- Screening capacity multiplied; candidates progress within a day.
Interview scheduling across panels
- The manual process today
- Coordinating four calendars over email takes days per candidate.
- What we build
- An agent that negotiates times with candidate and panel, books, reschedules and chases confirmations.
- Typical impact
- Scheduling reduced from days of email to minutes.
Sourcing and personalised outreach
- The manual process today
- Templated InMails get ignored, and manual personalisation does not scale.
- What we build
- Profile research plus outreach written to each candidate's actual background, with reply handling and interest qualification.
- Typical impact
- Response rates typically double against templated outreach.
Job description and ad generation
- The manual process today
- JDs are copy-pasted from ten-year-old templates.
- What we build
- Generation from the hiring manager's intake conversation, tuned for inclusivity and channel, with variants per platform.
- Typical impact
- Better applicant quality from clearer, more specific ads.
Candidate re-engagement from your ATS
- The manual process today
- Thousands of silver-medal candidates sit in the ATS unused.
- What we build
- Automatic matching of new roles against past applicants and re-engagement with the context of their previous application.
- Typical impact
- Placements sourced at near-zero acquisition cost.
Reference and compliance checking
- The manual process today
- Chasing referees and right-to-work documents by email.
- What we build
- Automated reference collection, document verification and expiry tracking with escalation when something is missing.
- Typical impact
- Compliance packs completed faster with a clean audit trail.
Onboarding orchestration
- The manual process today
- New starters need accounts, kit, training and paperwork coordinated across five teams.
- What we build
- A workflow that fires all provisioning tasks, chases owners and answers the new starter's questions from your handbook.
- Typical impact
- Day-one readiness becomes the norm rather than the exception.
What recruiting teams ask us.
It can be if done carelessly. We use explicit job-related criteria, keep evidence for every score, retain human decision-making on rejections, and support adverse-impact monitoring so you can demonstrate fairness.
Candidates dislike silence far more than they dislike automation. Fast, transparent screening with a real reply beats a two-week void.
Audits are a fixed fee and are credited against a build. Single-workflow builds typically land in the low five figures, multi-workflow programmes higher, and ongoing running and support is a fixed monthly fee. You get the number before we start, not a rolling hourly bill.
A first pilot on your real data usually runs within two to four weeks of the kickoff call. Full deployment with integrations and training normally lands between weeks four and eight.
Tell us what your recruiting team keeps doing by hand.
Thirty minutes, no pitch deck. We map the process, tell you whether automation pays back, and give you a rough cost before you commit to anything.